23. Denying the antecedent: The executive is reasoning: If we don’t lower our prices
then we will lose money. We do lower our prices. So we won’t lose money.
25. Inconsistency: In a modern primarily urban society such as exists in Israel, most
people don’t raise their own meat but have to buy it from retail stores; so if these
stores were not allowed to sell meat from the pig, this means that most people in
Israel in effect would be forbidden to eat that sort of meat.
27. Non sequitur: What does being on sale have to do with whether or not it was
33. Inconsistency: It’s unlikely that we were neutral on the outcome if we provided
EXERCISE 15 2:
(Again, answers are provided hesitantly.)
1. Questionable analogy: Of course, philosophers and theologians have been
arguing about this one for thousands of years. (But it is questionable! )
3 . Slippery slope: In fact, the Panama Canal was (slightly) at risk as this was
written, but the reasons had nothing to do with what was going on in El Salvador,
or Nicaragua for that matter.
5. Questionable cause (or slippery slope): Overcrowding is bad, but golly gee, it
isn’t what makes kids use drugs. It doesn’t start in motion a series of events
leading to drug taking, or even gang violence, it just increases the likelihood of
less learning.