C. People low in need for cognition:
2. They are frequently swayed more by such simple cues as source credibility,
communicator attractiveness, and celebrity endorsements
D. You have to be somewhat intelligent to enjoy contemplating issues; thus, there is a
modest relationship between verbal intelligence and need for cognition
E. Research also points to the intriguing possibility that people low and high in need for
cognition are persuaded by different media
III. Self-Monitoring
A. High self-monitors put a premium on displaying appropriate behavior in social situations
B. High self-monitors devote a great deal of cognitive energy to processing a message
when it is delivered by a prestigious, attractive, and popular source
C. Low self-monitors are less concerned with playing a role or displaying socially
IV. Dogmatism
A. Dogmatism is the tendency to close off mind to new ideas and accept only the
opinions of conventional, established authorities
B. Individuals high in dogmatism:
2. They are also willing to accept the views of an expert, even when he or she uses
weak arguments to support the position (DeBono & Klein, 1993)
3. Hard to convince high-dogmatic individuals of anything
C. Low-dogmatic individuals are:
1. Open-minded
3. Willing to consider good arguments on behalf of a position
4. More open to persuasion, particularly from strong arguments
V. Additional Issues
A. A personality trait can affect attitudes by influencing the amount of thinking people
engage in when considering the issue
VI. Other Personality Factors
A. The need to evaluate
good or bad
B. People high in this need are prone to form opinions about people and issues
C. The need for affect focuses on a need to tune in to – or tune out – emotional events (Maio
& Esses, 2001)
2. They believe that strong emotions are beneficial, and emotions help people function
well in life
D. The need for closure involves a preference for getting a definitive answer on an issue and
a discomfort with ambiguity (Holbert & Hansen, 2006; Webster & Kruglanski, 1994)