Part IV
IV–17-6 Perreault, Cannon, & McCarthy
having the store nearby is very important to low–income, inner–city consumers who have to rely on public
transportation. It’s hard for them to shop around, and thus they are less price sensitive. Research
indicates that these stores can charge prices that are 5 percent higher on average with little effect on
sales volume. This would significantly increase profitability. Do you think the chain should charge higher
prices at its inner–city stores? If the manager of the store decided to set higher prices on some products
and leave others unchanged—to result in an overall average increase of 5 percent—what products would
you recommend for higher prices? Why? If prices were increased and antipoverty activists got TV
coverage by picketing the chain, how would you respond to a TV reporter covering the story?
To what extent does it matter if the higher prices reflect the higher costs as compared to the lower price
sensitivity? To keep a balanced perspective on the discussion, the instructor might ask – “What if the
higher cost to serve was only 3% – but prices are increased 5%. Is this ethical?”
The scenario also outlines the possibility of cross–subsidizing within stores. For example, some students
may argue that some staples – perhaps bread and milk – should not have higher prices. The lower profit
margins on these products could be offset by higher margin on other products. Grocery stores typically
make such adjustments as part of their pricing strategy. But what are the ethical implications in this
scenario?
An individual firm in a market–directed economy has no responsibility for the macro problems of poverty,
income distribution, and the sociology of the inner city. In our economic system, these problems have
been assigned to government and to non–governmental charitable organizations. Still, some business
organizations are increasingly addressing broader social issues in the communities they serve. These
companies may feel beholden to the triple bottom line – people, the planet, and profit. These issues are
discussed in more detail in the final chapter of the text.