98
4. Why do you think governments regulate retailing practices?
Beholden to the support of the local population, governments are motivated to protect the
CASE 13.2: WHO’S TO BLAME?
Smugglingits causes and consequencesis the central theme of this case. Some producers, like
the tobacco manufacturers mentioned in the case, benefit from smuggled goods. For others, the
negatives of smuggling far outweigh any potential benefits. The case also mentions actions
governments are taking to combat and deter smuggling behavior.
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. Why would BAT, or any multinational firm, cooperate with smugglers?
The Indian government restricted distribution of BAT products to duty-free shops and hotels,
2. How could smuggling hurt a multinational company?
First, a multinational firm could be accused of participating in smuggling and this could result
in fines, arrests and/or bad publicity.
(Chapter 11).
3. Why do you think some countries are introducing stiff penalties for smuggling?
Tariffs and taxes can be a key source of government revenue. Smuggled goods are lost
4. Whom do you think should be held responsible for smuggling—the manufacturer, the
smugglers themselves, the retailers, or the final consumer?
Most students will immediately state that the smugglers themselves should be held