4. In measuring the economic impact of a sport team, is it correct to count both the
spending by fans inside the stadium and the spending by the team (in running its
operations) in the community?
In general, the answer is no. This could lead to double-counting, as explained in the text.
You might wonder why money spent by a visitor in a hotel that is then re-spent by the
hotel and its employees in the community gets counted as indirect spending. Doesn’t
5. All else being equal, does increasing the size of the geographic area of impact raise,
lower, or have no effect on the capture rate?
Generally, increasing the geographic area of impact will raise the capture rate, because
initial direct spending will have a harder time leaking out if the geographic area is large.
Imagine measuring the economic impact of a St. Louis Cardinals baseball game on the
United States as a whole. Most of the re-spending (the amount that stays in the