the cost of inbound distinctly lower than outbound. HubSpot is a strong spokesperson for this
point of view with its own excellent content strategy, but it is definitely not the only marketing
services agency in the space. They illustrate traditional mass media channels (the hammer)
against inbound (the magnet), which are all Internet-based in Figure 10.8a. Then they go on to
identify three components which are essential for inbound. Content, propagated as widely as
possible around the web) is the first building block. Then SEO and social media can draw
attention to the content, and drive people to the website. Assuming this is part of a lead process
the marketer needs to offer an incentive—likely to be more content—to get the visitor to register
giving email address and other essential data to qualify her as a lead.
I’m fond of the paragraph that ends this section; it’s something that students have a surprisingly
hard time getting their arms around:
The question “how much does it cost?” is the one usually asked. However, the more important
issue would be what sales would cost without it. That issue was pretty much settled by the late
1980s when some large tech firms tried to limit customer access to their field sales forces
because it was costing so much. Sales lead programs are the only viable alternative, but that
The two case studies in this section are interesting, but perhaps not for the reason intended.
Cloud Marketing Labs, whose 2010 program was a rousing success by the metrics, seems to
have disappeared from the scene. Doyenz, which tried something innovative that didn’t appear to