12
Chapter 01 – Marketing Research for Managerial Decision Making
Research providers may occasionally conduct research that does not meet professional
standards. For example, a client may insist that a research firm use a particular methodology
even though the research firm feels the methodology will not answer the research question
posed by the client. Fearful of losing the business entirely, a firm may go along with their
client’s wishes. Or a research provider may agree to do a study even though the firm does not
have the expertise to conduct the kind of study needed by the client. In this case, the client
should be referred to another research provider.
Interviewers working for research firms may also engage in unethical behavior. A practice of
falsifying data known to many researchers and field interviewers is called curbstoning, or
rocking-chair interviewing. Curbstoning occurs when the researcher’s trained interviewers or
observers, rather than conducting interviews or observing respondents’ actions as directed in
the study, will complete the interviews themselves or make up “observed” respondents’
behaviors. Other data falsification practices include having friends and relatives fill out
surveys, not using the designated sample of respondents but rather anyone who is conveniently
available to complete the survey, or not following up on the established callback procedures
indicated in the research procedure. To minimize the likelihood of data falsification, research
companies typically randomly verify 10 to 15 percent of the interviews through callbacks.
C. Abuse of Respondents (PPT slides 1-21 to 1-22)
Following are the several potential ways to abuse respondents in marketing research.
• Research firms may not provide the promised incentive (contest awards, gifts, or money)
to respondents for completing interviews or questionnaires.