1. Robert W. Hoyer and Wayne C. Ellis, “A
Graphical Exploration of SPC, Part 1,” Quality
Progress 29, no. 5 (May 1996), 65–73.
2. This discussion is adapted from James R.
Evans, Statistical Process Control for Quality Improve-
5. Raymond R. Mayer, “Selecting Control Lim-
its,” Quality Progress 16, no 9, (1983), 24–26.
6. Robert W. Traver, “Pre-Control: A Good Al-
ternative to x– R-Charts,” Quality Progress 18, no. 9
(September 1985).
Chapter 12 Statistical Process Control 761
f(10) =
(0.5)10(0.5)1= 0.00537
If the process is in control, either of these events is highly unlikely.
Table 12A.1 shows the probabilities associated with seven common rules used for
interpreting control charts for normal, slightly skewed, and seriously skewed process
outputs. Note that, even for the skewed distributions, almost all of the conditions
have probabilities less than 0.01 when the process is in control. Close analysis of this
table suggests the following:
11
10
NOTES