Kinicki/Williams, Management, 9e: Chapter 8 Organizational Culture, Structure, and Design: Building
Blocks of the Organization
8–34
Copyright © 2020 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of
McGraw-Hill Education.
structure. What has changed is the departmentalization of the company, with product lines being
grouped together in ways that more clearly emphasize the company’s cloud offerings, and group
hardware and devices together more cleanly. This shift reflects Nadella’s desire to shift
Microsoft’s strategy more toward its cloud-based businesses. However, the structural change
mainly affects the engineering function, and doesn’t change Microsoft’s financial reporting.
Furthermore, it appears that there is no fundamental change to Microsoft’s existing matrix
structure.
Topics and Tips for Discussion:
1. For either your current company or a previous one, evaluate the extent to which you
believe there is an effective linking among the firm’s strategy, culture, and structure.
Describe any changes you would recommend.
2. Describe the advantages of mechanistic organizations versus organic ones. Is one
approach better than the other? Defend your point of view.
3. Describe potential indicators that point to a mismatch between a firm’s strategy and its
organizational structure. As a future manager, how will you know when you need to take
corrective action to address a mismatch?
A common indicator of a mismatch between strategy and structure is lack of progress on
important strategic initiatives. If an initiative is not making progress, it is possible that
the current organizational structure is preventing the people who need to be working
Section 8.7 Key Concepts: