Chapter 08 – Protecting People and Information: Threats and Safeguards
8-14
CLOSING CASES
CLOSING CASE STUDY ONE (p. 250)
Sexting Now Almost Commonplace
Great case study on the use of mobile devices for the purpose of sexting – sending of sexually
explicit messages and/or photos, primarily between mobile phones. It’s becoming a real issue
for all ages of people.
QUESTIONS
1. Adult sexting is perfectly legal, as it is the sharing of sexually explicit content between two
consenting adults. But what about teen sexting – should that be legal? If a 16-year-old
boy sends a sext to his 16-year-old partner, should that be considered child pornography?
Why or why not?
2. If you refer back to Figure 8.1 on page 228, where would you place adult sexting – a minor
ethical violation, a serious ethical violation, or a very serious ethical violation? What
circumstances – consequences, society’s opinion, likelihood of effect, time to consequences,
relatedness, and reach of result – might move adult sexting from a minor ethical violation to
a serious ethical violation and then finally onto a very serious ethical violation?
DISCUSSION
• Great question for class discussion.
• Most younger people would consider adult sexting to be a minor ethical violation or
perhaps no ethical violation at all.
• Circumstances that might changes things:
3. Consider the whole notion of power being tied to sexting, flirting, and cheating? From a
psychological point of view why might this be true? Do some research into Tiger Woods’
troubles with extra-marital affairs. Could his cheating be tied to his position of power? Is
“power” an appropriate justification for such actions?