Chapter 08 – Control, Change, and Entrepreneurship
III. Behavior Control
Behavior control, along with output control, is a
method of motivating employees. There are three
mechanisms of behavior control that managers can use:
direct supervision, management by objectives, and
rules and standard operating procedures.
A. Direct Supervision: The most immediate and
potent form of behavior control is direct supervision by
managers.
1. Under direct supervision, managers actively
monitor and observe, teach, and correct
subordinates.
2. When managers personally supervise
subordinates, they lead by example and in this
way, help subordinates develop and increase their
own skills.
3. Problems associated with direct supervision
include the following:
a. It is very expensive because a manager can
personally manage only a small number of
subordinates effectively. For this reason,
output control is usually preferred over
behavior control.
subordinates if they feel that they are not free
to make their own decisions.
a job is, the more difficult it is for a manager
to determine how well an employee is
performing.
POWERPOINT SLIDES 8-21 TO 8-25
TEXT REFERENCE
Management Insight: Netflix Lacks
Bureaucratic Control—On Purpose
Netflix, a company that offers on-
demand Internet streaming of movies,
TV shows, and original content, as well
as DVDs by mail, uses little bureaucratic
control within its organizational
framework. There are no traditional
performance appraisals, no formal
tracking of vacation time for managers,
and no performance-based bonuses.
The following five ideas define Netflix’s
control philosophy: 1) hire, reward, and
tolerate only fully formed adults, 2) tell
the truth about performance, 3) managers
own the job of creating great teams, 4)
leaders own the job of creating the
company culture, and 5) good talent
managers think like businesspeople and
innovators first and like HR people last.
Netflix went from 600,000 members in
2002 to more than 50 million global
members in 2014. The company has been
successful despite having little
bureaucratic control.(pp. 282–283)