Chapter 7: Innovation and Change
cost respirator mask. Buckley said, “I didn’t drive the invention of this, but I said the invention of this is necessary.
You have to drive out costs to defend yourself against competition. I wanted the manufacturing process that made
these respirators [to have] a quadrupling in speed and efficiency.” Says Buckley, “We often think innovation is
making a breakthrough at the top of the pyramid. That’s often not where the hardest challenges are. The hardest
challenges are often: How do I make a breakthrough for next to nothing?”
Another example of the incremental approach to innovation using the compression method is when 3M
scientists can leverage ideas from other products or scientists in the company. 3M was able to do this with its
Finally, sometimes companies innovate from within by successfully implementing creative ideas in their products or
services. Sometimes, though, innovation is acquired by purchasing other companies that have made innovative
advances. For example, while Google is generally rated as one of the most innovative companies in the world, most
people have forgotten that Google bought YouTube to combine its search expertise with YouTube’s online video
capabilities. Over time, how much should companies like 3M rely on acquisitions for innovation? Should 3M
acquire half, one-third, 10 percent, or 5 percent of its new products through acquisitions? What makes the most
sense and why?
One way to grow a company is through internal or organic growth. And when your strategy is innovation, like
at 3M, that means innovating with new products and services developed from your existing businesses. Another
way to grow is through external growth, or buying other companies. And when your strategy is innovation, that
means acquiring or buying other companies which have developed innovative products and services. The question
is how much should 3M focus on internal growth and innovation versus external growth and innovation through
acquisitions?
It’s a difficult question to answer. When innovation is your core competency and your company’s source of
competitive advantage, relying too much on acquisitions for innovation is an admission that you’re failing to
If there’s a less than 50% chance that acquired companies will prosper, is there some way to increase the odds
of success when acquiring companies and their technological innovations? The best approach is probably related
diversification, in which the different business units share similar products, manufacturing, marketing, technology,