Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
Markov Processes
Chapter 7
An Introduction to Linear Programming
Learning Objectives
1. Obtain an overview of the kinds of problems linear programming has been used to solve.
5. Understand the importance of extreme points in obtaining the optimal solution.
6. Know the use and interpretation of slack and surplus variables.
7. Be able to interpret the computer solution of a linear programming problem.
8. Understand how alternative optimal solutions, infeasibility and unboundedness can occur in linear
programming problems.
Chapter 17
Solutions:
1. a, b, and e, are acceptable linear programming relationships.
c is not acceptable because of
2. a.
c.
Markov Processes
3. a.
c.
Chapter 17
c.
used to locate position of
5.
Markov Processes
6. a. 7A + 10B = 420
b. 6A + 4B = 420
c. -4A + 7B = 420
7.
Chapter 17
8.
9.
Markov Processes
10.
3
4
5
B
Optimal Solution
A= 12/7, B= 15/7
Value of Objective Function = 2(12/7) + 3(15/7) = 69/7
Chapter 17
11.
100
B
100 200
Optimal Solution
A= 100, B= 50
Value of Objective Function = 750
A= 100
B= 80
12. a.
Markov Processes
b.
2
3
B
Optimal Solution
A= 0, B= 3
Value of Objective Function = 18
13. a.
Chapter 17
c.
6
8
B
2 4 6 8
Optimal Solution
A= 2, B= 4
14. a. Let S = number of standard bags
D = number of deluxe bags
1/10S
+
1/4D
135
Inspection and packaging
b. Profit = $7668
c. & d.
Sewing
480
120
Finishing
708
0
Inspection and Packaging
117
Markov Processes
15. a.
b. Similar to part (a): the same feasible region with a different objective function. The optimal
solution occurs at (708, 0) with a profit of z = 20(708) + 9(0) = 14,160.
c. The sewing constraint is redundant. Such a change would not change the optimal solution to the
original problem.
16. a. A variety of objective functions with a slope greater than -4/10 (slope of I & P line) will make
extreme point (0, 540) the optimal solution. For example, one possibility is 3S + 9D.
b. Optimal Solution is S = 0 and D = 540.
c.
17.
Chapter 17
18. a.
+
+
1S1
=
3A
+
2B
+
1S2
=
2A
+
2B
+
1S3
=
b.
c. S1 = 0, S2 = 0, S3 = 4/7
19. a.
Markov Processes
b.
0
B
2 4 6 8
A
10
12
14
10 12
(2)
(1)
(3)
c. S1 = 8 + A – 2B = 8 + 20/3 – 16/3 = 28/3
20. a.
Chapter 17
b.
c. S1 = (3.43 + 3.43) – 4 = 2.86
S2 = 24 – [3(3.43) + 4(3.43)] = 0
Markov Processes
21. a. and b.
B
Optimal Solution
50
60
70
80
90
Constraint 2
c. Optimal solution occurs at the intersection of constraints 1 and 2. For constraint 2,
B = 10 + A
Substituting for B in constraint 1 we obtain
Chapter 17
22. a.
2000
C
2500
3000
3500
Inspection and
Packaging
Cutting and
Dyeing
5
b.
Extreme point 3 generates the highest profit.
c. Optimal solution is A = 1400, C = 600
23. a. Let E = number of units of the EZ-Rider produced
L = number of units of the Lady-Sport produced
E, L 0
b.
c. The binding constraints are the manufacturing time and the assembly and testing time.
24. a. Let R = number of units of regular model.
C = number of units of catcher’s model.
L
400
500
600
700
Engine
Manufacturing Time
Number of Lady-Sport Produced
Chapter 17
400
400 800
R
200
200 6000 1000
Optimal Solution
(500,150)
P & S
Regular Model
Catcher’s Model
c. 5(500) + 8(150) = $3,700
e.
Markov Processes
26. a. a. Let N = amount spent on newspaper advertising
R = amount spent on radio advertising
N, R 0
b.
27. Let I = Internet fund investment in thousands
B = Blue Chip fund investment in thousands
Available investment funds
Maximum investment in the internet fund
Maximum risk for a moderate investor
Chapter 17
Internet fund $20,000
Blue Chip fund $30,000
Annual return $ 5,100
b. The third constraint for the aggressive investor becomes
6I + 4B 320
This constraint is redundant; the available funds and the maximum Internet fund investment
constraints define the feasible region. The optimal solution is:
c. The third constraint for the conservative investor becomes
6I + 4B 160
This constraint becomes a binding constraint. The optimal solution is
B
Optimal Solution
40
50
60
Risk Constraint
Maximum
Internet Funds
I = 20, B = 30
$5,100
Internet Fund (000s)