Chapter 5: Contingency and Situational Leadership
Accurate answers to the seven situational variables can be challenging to obtain. The model,
however, provides a few useful clues about making individual versus group decisions:
1. A consultative or collaborative decision-making style is best when information from
others is needed to solve the problem, the problem is not clearly defined, and there is
enough time for a group decision.
V. LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE (LMX) AND C ONTINGENCY THEORY
Leaders who adapt their style to different individuals within the group, or have different quality
relationships with individual members, are essentially practicing contingency leadership. Here we
present several conclusions from LMX research that suggests a contingency approach to leadership.
1. Leaders tend to give members of their in-group more favorable performance ratings than they
give to out-group members, even when their objective performance is the same.
5. Leaders are more likely to empower group members with whom they have a high-quality
exchange (or good relationship) because they are more likely to trust those members.
6. Larger differences in leader-member exchanges tend to lead to higher team performance when
the LMX-quality median is low. In contrast, when the LMX-quality median is high, differences
in leader-member exchanges are not related to team performance.
VI. LEADERSHIP DURING A CRISIS
Leading during a crisis can be regarded as contingency leadership because the situation demands
that the leader emphasize certain behaviors, attitudes, and traits. Crisis leadership is the process of
leading group members through a sudden, largely unanticipated, intensely negative, and emotionally