Chapter 5: Planning and Decision Making
powder to chemicals, DuPont’s slogan became, “Better things for better living … through chemistry.” Is
it time, again, to reconsider what DuPont is all about?
compared to a set of 19 peer companies. After such an extended period of poor performance, is it enough
just to examine how DuPont does business, or should the company reexamine its purpose, that is, its
reason for existing?
DuPont CEO, Ellen Kullman, tells a story in which she shares that she is reading the biography of Alfred
du Pont, one of the sons of founder E.I. du Pont, who later bought and ran the company with his cousins,
Pierre and Coleman du Pont. Kullman says,
The company they bought in 1902 was still very much the explosives company that it had been
throughout the 19th century. But they didn’t look back; they looked forward. In many ways they
Kullman’s predecessor, CEO Charles O. Holliday Jr., began the process of changing DuPont’s
purpose by selling Conoco Oil, pharmaceutical divisions, and nylon and textile divisions, the latter of
which were once thought to be the core of the company. In their absence, Holliday stated that DuPont
would “be the world’s most dynamic science company.” Kullman built on Holliday’s changes, declaring
that DuPont was in the “innovation and science” business.
Was it time, again, to reconsider what DuPont was all about? Clearly, according to CEO Kullman it
was. For the second time in its 210 year history, DuPont changed why it exists.
Or, instead of an intense focus on DuPont’s purpose, would it make more sense to make lots of plans and
lots of bets so that “a thousand flowers can bloom?” In other words, would it be better to keep options
open by making small, simultaneous investments in many alternative plans? Then, when one or a few of
these plans emerge as likely winners, you invest even more in these plans while discontinuing or reducing
investment in the others.