Kinicki/Williams, Management, 9e: Chapter 3 The Manager’s Changing Work Environment and Ethical
Responsibilities: Doing the Right Thing
3-41
GROUP EXERCISE
SOLVING AN ETHICAL DILEMMA
Objective
• To further students’ understanding regarding the four approaches to deciding ethical
dilemmas.
Introduction
Our personal values impact the determination of what is ethical. Researchers have identified four
approaches to deciding ethical dilemmas that are grounded in values. They are: the utilitarian
approach, the individual approach, the moral rights approach, and the justice approach. This
exercise provides students the opportunity to solve an ethical dilemma from the vantage point of
each of these four approaches to deciding ethical dilemmas.
Instructions
1. Students should remain at their desks and read the scenario below.
2. You are a struggling writer. Several of your short stories are published thanks to winning
entries in various writing contests. You are majoring in creative writing and English; your
peers are also writers. Recently, you entered a university sponsored writing contest and
placed third, another person in your class took home the grand prize. At first you were
not upset, but a friend called you last week and told you she read the winning entry and it
was remarkably similar to a story you published on the Internet a few months ago. You
obtain a copy and sure enough, the plot is the same, the major characters are pretty much
the same (though their names are different), and the only real difference you find is that
the story takes place in a different city than yours. Although your original words were not
used, you feel your classmate plagiarized your story. Tomorrow is the banquet honoring
the winners of the contest, and your classmate will of course be there. What are you
going to do?
3. Have each student decide what he or she would do based on each of the four approaches
5. Have students openly discuss what they would do for each approach, and then derive
consensus recommendations.
Questions for Discussion
1. To what extent did the group develop different recommendations for each approach?
2. Was it difficult for the group to reach a consensus on how to handle the situation based
on each approach? Explain.