Case 30 Teaching Note Concussions in Collegiate and Professional Football
656
Lawsuits against schools, athletic associations (NCAA, NFL, NCAA conferences), and helmet manufacturers
became common, and lawyers solicited concussion cases, fighting among themselves for positions in court
as concussions became a next big plum for the legal community. The NCAA and NFL scrambled to provide
increased concussion protection for players and rules were amended to reduce head injury. Legal expenses and
compliance costs soared as schools, teams, associations, and helmet manufacturers were faced with increasing
expenses to develop and implement concusson management plans and deal with the attacks.
In May 2018, as off-season workouts were beginning for the NFL players, in the midst of the rabid rush of
lawyers filing class action lawsuits attempting to collect millions of dollars, a clear question emerged: Who was
responsible for brain damage due to football concussions? Was it the colleges and their teams, the NCAA and
NFL, helmet manufacturers, or the athletes themselves? If an athlete capable of being in college, or at the age
of adulthood, made the conscious decision to play football after being made aware of the risks associated with
concussions, should he be able to collect purported damages from others?
There is ample detail in the case for students to evaluate and discuss:
The schools of thought of ethical behavior
The impact of organizational culture on an ethical issue
The relevant macro-environmental factors that may affect an ethical issue
Suggestions for Using the Case
This brand new and highly interesting case should generate considerable student interest, and provoke spirited
class discussion about the ethics of the football concussion issue. Students will be familiar with the problem of
football concussions, some will know football players, and you may have players in your class; consequently,
there will be considerable first-hand knowledge of the issue. There will be varying opinions of the problem
ranging from ‘athletes are adults and should be allowed to play contact football if, when, and how they wish’, to
‘football should be banned because it cannot be made safe’.
This case traces the concussion issue from the initial awareness of the problem, through the most recent attempts
to reduce the frequency and magnitude of head injuries. Because of the wide publicity of the football concussion
problem, and the students’ familiarity with college football (and likely the NFL also), this case presents a unique