Kinicki/Williams, Management, 9e: Chapter 2 Management Theory: Essential Background for the Successful
Manager
2-37
EXAMPLE: Application of Behavioral Science Approach: The Open-Plan Office—
Productivity Enhancer or Productivity Killer?
Organizations began experimenting with open-plan office spaces in the 1950s, and up to 80
percent of offices today utilize this idea. The question to be answered is: Do open-space floor
plans actually contribute to better communication, higher productivity, and better interpersonal
relations? Are the potential benefits outweighed by noise (both audio and visual) and lack of
privacy?
YOUR CALL
1. If so, many U.S. employees now work in open offices, yet behavioral science studies largely
show they are not a productive or beneficial arrangement, why do you suppose they continue to
be so prevalent? What kind of office arrangements do you think would work best and why?
Have students utilize the ideas of Munsterberg, Follett, Mayo, Maslow, and McGregor to
analyze why the open-office plan became so popular.
2. What kind of office arrangements do you think would work best and why?
Lead students to discuss the layouts in the offices where they work. Can they imagine working in
an open plan office? Would they enjoy it? Why or why not?
ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES
1. Have students watch this video “The Origins of Our Open Office Hellscape.” Then have them
answer a series of questions, either individually or in groups:
What was the basic idea behind open offices?
What was right about early open offices?
What went wrong? (you might have them compare Frank Lloyd Wright’s concept with
todays’ office plans.)
2. Have students watch the following video: 4 Tips to Keep You Sane at the Open Space Office.
ONLINE