Instructor Resource
Rowe, Cases in Leadership 5e
SAGE Publications, Inc., 2019
Case Notes
Case 2.1: London Health Sciences Centre: Talent Development (A) and (B)
Ken Mark wrote this teaching note under the supervision of Professor David Loree as an aid to
instructors in the classroom use of the cases London Health Sciences Centre: Talent
Development (A) and (B), Nos. 9B16C049 and 9B16C050. This teaching note should not be used
in any way that would prejudice the future use of the cases.
This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized or otherwise reproduced in any
form or by any means without the permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this
material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order
copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business
Teaching Note
A director in critical care at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) is asking a manager to
review two candidates for promotion to a front-line coordinator position. James Erwell has been
tasked with the job of choosing between two promising candidates: Jane McNeil and Sara
Andrews. The two nurses are quite different from each other, and Erwell has to look carefully at
the two candidates to determine which one will be better suited as a front-line coordinator.
The immediate question is about which candidate should be selected. However, the process
reveals a larger issue: an opportunity to initiate a robust leadership-selection process at the
hospital. The case describes a situation where a candidate for promotion needs to be identified
within a few hours. A more rigorous selection process would mean that the director in critical
care would already have a list of candidates, ranked by suitability.