Chapter 15 – Communicating
15–14
➢ Organizational Distance – miscommunication is common between people who hold positions at
different levels in an organization. For instance, a conversation between the CEO of an aerospace
firm and a forklift operator may fail to achieve mutual understanding of a work situation.
➢ Physical Distance and Time – the most accurate communication results from face-to-face com-
munication. The further apart the communicators, the more miscommunication occurs. For field
to work too close together.
➢ Lack of Common knowledge – when two people do not share common knowledge, miscommuni-
cation is almost certain to result, especially in this age of high-tech working environments. This
problem is worsened by the use of technical jargon or “gobbledygook,” that is too often used in
an attempt to impress others, not communicate with them.
➢ Perception – this is the way a person experiences and understands the universe. People do not re-
spond to the reality of their environment but to their unique perception of it. Each of us has our
own unique perceptual values and processes that make it difficult for us to agree on situations that
surround our lives. Perceptual readiness is the tendency to perceive what we expect to receive,
➢ Semantics – the meaning of the word, is the source of many communication problems. If we
agree that people are unique and have unique perceptual processes, it is not suprising that words
mean different things to different people. Some words (drugs, gangs, gays, capitalists, terrorists,
and so on) are “loaded” with different and conflicting meanings.
➢ Communication Style – each person has a personalized and unique style of communication – a
LECTURETTE 15.2: Readability and Corporate Communication
ILLITERACY IN THE UNITED STATES
A 1986 study by the U.S. Census Bureau found that 27 million adult Americans couldn’t read. Still an-
other 35 million are functionally illiterate, meaning that they read so poorly that they find it difficult to
cope with daily activities. Each year, another 2.3 million Americans join the population of functional illit-