13
Chapter 14: Managing and Enhancing Performance: The Big Picture
© 2020 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
interventions, beginning with early studies from the 19th century. This study found out that,
although feedback was effective in almost two-thirds of the cases, it was not effective in the
rest. In fact, in a large number of cases, providing feedback to employees actually lowered
subsequent performance.
B. ProMES
The productivity measurement and evaluation system (ProMES) incorporates ideas from
goal setting to feedback, and it includes incentives for improvement. More important, it
includes a method for tying performance at the individual and group levels to organizational
productivity.
The other important part of the ProMES process involves the various “connections” among
the components. The procedure is based on a model of motivation that is similar to the
expectancy model. Thus, these connections are concerned with the relationship between effort
some measures of engagement correlate very highly with job satisfaction. But still others have
argued that employee engagement is a unique and important construct that is worth studying
in its own right. Whether employee engagement is a truly new idea or simply a new way of
looking at affective reactions to the job may not really matter. Instead, what may matter is that
V. Evaluating Performance-Enhancement Programs
It is relatively easy to think about measures of individual performance (units produced or sales
dollars), but assessing firm-level performance is much more complex. First, any true measure of
organizational success must tie back the organization’s strategic goals. In addition, several more
general indexes of firm-level performance could be useful in determining firm performance.