Building, and Sustaining Quality and Performance Excellence 4
– Information about key management, including senior leaders, and directors of the
four target areas of patient services, quality assessment, financial management, and
human resources
– Level of commitment to quality and understanding of the meaning and philosophy of
1. Are senior leaders interested in quality for the long term, or are they simply looking for
ways to treat short-term symptoms of problems?
2. Are those same leaders willing to be personally involved in training and becoming
champions of the Six Sigma quality effort?
3. Do those leaders understand that changes must/will occur in the corporate culture
which will affect them, as well as everyone in management and non-management
positions in SLRMC?
4. Are the leaders willing to invest financial and human resources in establishing Six
Sigma as a long-term commitment to a quality policy?
5. How will the Six Sigma process and results help to meet strategic objectives, thus
providing strategic benefits to the organizaiton?
6. How will processes be aligned with Six Sigma projects and approaches?
7. What will be the challenges and advantages of using Six Sigma to solve problems
versus how that is currently done?
8. How will Six Sigma projects and results be measured and aligned with current or
future perfomance measurement processes?
9. To what extent will the workforce and managers at all levels have to be trained in
process thinking and a focus on results?
10. How will workforce training, rewards, and recognition for the Six Sigma initiative be
structured?