Chapter 13 Learning Track 3 3
continued
in the firm, and rank order them on various criteria such as cost-benefit: how much does each
process contribute to profits and how much does it cost. ose processes which have a poor cost–
benefit ratio would be candidates for BPM. is rational approach is not very useful if only because
the cost of identifying all the business processes is prohibitive, and linking each to a portion of
profits virtually impossible.
One method is to rely on a business scorecard approach in which senior executives decide the
A different less formal method is also used. I call this the pain reduction method which is a vari-
ation of the “squeaky wheel” approach. Sometimes particular business processes are trouble-
some and produce negative results that obviously hurt the business. A poor Web site may turnoff
customers; a loading dock may be the source of many accidents; some process might be far more
costly than the same process developed by competitors; the number of employees in a transaction
processing unit or call center may be expanding faster than sales, suggesting a problem worthy of
further investigation. Briey, some processes are well-known in the firm as not being very good or
effective. ese become candidates for further analysis.
Analyze existing processes. Once a candidate process is identified for improvement, the next
step is to analyze the process and determine how much resources in terms of time and costs
are expended by the process. Once this is understood, the results can be compared to historical
Design new processes. Once the existing process is mapped and measured in terms of time and
cost, the next step is to try to improve the process by designing a new one. Generally, alternative