Copyright © 2020 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the
prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
2. How would you counter the arguments offered by those on the other side of this
debate?
3. Are there any circumstances in which you think the government’s right to information
should take precedence over an individual’s right to privacy?
Again, this is highly subjective issue. One might argue that when terrorism and
national security are at risk, as they are in this case, that individuals must give up
some of their rights for the “good of all.” This occurred after the September 11th
Chuck Cohen, of the Indiana State Police task force on Internet crimes against
children, is quoted at the end of the discussion case and focuses on another issue.
What if the lives of children are in question? Should individual rights be protected
then?
4. Should any technology firm be allowed to create a privacy protection system that is
so impenetrable that it could never be overridden, regardless of the government’s
need for this information?