11.2 Organizing for Collaborating
Organizations need to be more flexible in how work gets done. Throw in the fact
that innovation and the ability to bring innovations to market quickly is critical and
you can begin to appreciate how traditional top-down decision-making that strictly
follows the chain of command and narrowly defines functional arrangements
might not be the best structural mechanisms to do this. Exhibit 11-3 lists some
of the benefits and drawbacks of working collaboratively.
A. Internal Collaboration
When managers believe that collaboration among employees is needed
for more coordinated and integrated work efforts, they can use several
different structural options. Some of the more popular include cross-
functional teams, task forces, and communities of practice.
1. Cross-Functional Teams. Organizations are using team-based
2. Task Forces. Another structural option organizations might use is
3. Communities of Practice. These are “groups of people who
share a concern, a set of problems, or a passion about a topic,
and who deepen their knowledge and expertise in that area by
B. External Collaboration
When managers seek out customers to help solve problems, they are
engaging in external collaboration. External collaboration comes in two
forms: open innovation and strategic partnerships. Each of these can
provide organizations with needed information, support, and contributions
to getting work done and achieving organizational goals.
1. Open Innovation. This form of innovation opens up the search
2. Strategic Partnerships. This type of structure involves
11.3 Flexible Work Arrangements
As organizations adapt their structural designs to fit a diverse workforce, growing
competition, customer demands, and new technology, we see more of them
adopting flexible working arrangements. Such arrangements not only exploit the
power of technology, but also give organizations the flexibility to deploy
employees when and where needed.