Kinicki/Williams, Management, 9e: Chapter 10 Organizational Change and Innovation: Lifelong Challenges for the
Exceptional Manager
10–45
GROUP EXERCISES
GROUP EXERCISE #1: CREATING PERSONAL CHANGE THROUGH FORCE-FIELD ANALYSIS
Objectives
● To apply force-field analysis to a behavior or situation you would like to change.
● To receive feedback on your strategies for bringing about change.
Introduction
The theory of force-field analysis is based on the premise that people resist change because of
counteracting positive and negative forces. Positive forces for change are called thrusters. They
propel people to accept change and modify their behavior. In contrast, counterthrusters, or
resistors, are negative forces that motivate an individual to maintain the status quo. People
frequently fail to change because they experience equal amounts of positive and negative forces
to change.
Force-field analysis is a technique used to facilitate change by first identifying the thrusters and
resistors that exist in a specific situation. To minimize resistance to change, it is generally
recommended to first reduce or remove the negative forces to change. Removing
counterthrusters should create increased pressure for an individual to change in the desired
direction.
Instructions
Have the students break into pairs; these two people will serve as a team that evaluates the
completeness of the other’s force-field analysis and recommendations. Once the teams are
assembled, each individual should complete the following Force-Field Analysis Form. Once both
team members have completed the activity, one team member should present results from steps 2
through 4 in the Force-Field Analysis Form. The other team member should then evaluate the
results by considering the following questions with his or her partner.
1. Are there any additional thrusters and counterthrusters that should be listed? Add them to the
2. Do you agree with the “strength” evaluations of thrusters and counterthrusters in Step 4? The
3. Examine the specific recommendations for change listed in Step 5, and evaluate whether you
think they will produce the desired changes. Be sure to consider whether the focal person has
the ability to eliminate, reduce, or increase each thruster and counterthruster that is the basis
for a specific recommendation. Are there any alternative strategies you can think of?
4. What is your overall evaluation of your partner’s intervention strategy?