9
Chapter 1: The Nature of Human Resource Management
© 2020 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Individual growth and development may also focus on areas that do not relate directly to job
responsibilities. For example, some organizations provide stress-management programs to
help their employees better cope with the anxieties and tensions of modern life. Wellness and
fitness programs are also becoming more common as organizations seek new and different
ways to help their employees remain physically, mentally, and emotionally fit and better
prepared to manage their lives and careers.
In general, more firms are seeing human resource management as part of the psychological
contract that they have with employees: Provide a personally rewarding work experience in
return for the employees’ working toward the firm’s strategic goals. A psychological
contract is the overall set of expectancies held by the employee with regard to what he or she
will contribute to the organization and held by the organization with regard to what it will
provide to the individual in return.
IV. The Setting for Human Resource Management
Traditionally, all HR activities resided in a separate department, but this model is becoming rare.
Instead, HR activities are carried out by both line and staff managers.
A. Human Resource Management as a Staff versus Line Function
Line managers were those directly responsible for creating goods and services; that is, their
contributions to the organization were generally assessed in terms of their actual contributions
and costs to the organization’s bottom line. Staff managers, on the other hand, were those
responsible for an indirect or support function that would have costs but whose bottom-line
contributions were less direct. Legal, accounting, and HR departments were usually thought
of as staff functions. Their role was to support line management’s efforts to achieve
organizational goals and objectives.
Today, however, many organizations have blurred this distinction. New forms of
organizational design (such as teams and an emphasis on flatter and more decentralized