Page 3 8B13M042
The third option is the most conservative of the three, as leaving Russia does not involve significant sunk costs.
Mabe has learned some important lessons and can likely apply these learnings to return to Russia in the future with
2. What lessons has Mabe learned that it can apply to future international expansions?
Mabe had been very successful in its efforts toward international expansion. The alliance with GE had proved to be
a win-win situation but it seems that Mabe’s top team had become overconfident. Mabe’s expansion to Latin
American countries was relatively simple, as language, religion, time zones and culture were similar to Mabe’s
1. Not to rely so much on the “action learning methodology” that was originally brought from GE’s know-how.
2. To understand the significant effect of culture on business performance. While they devoted themselves to
3. To reconsider the use of Mabe brands in markets outside Latin America due to the “provenance paradox,”
3. Would another emerging country have been a better investment for Mabe than Russia?
This question is a difficult one to answer. Back in 2004, Mabe wanted to expand to a BRIC country. It had already
entered Brazil, and China seemed too complex. The only countries remaining were India and Russia. During 2004,