Review, Practice, and Explore – Chapter 8 • 77
B. Which of the following examples violate parallelism? Why or why not? Is it accurate
to say that parallelism always requires the coordination of the same syntactic category?
Under what circumstances can this requirement be relaxed?
1. Artichokes are in season and very delicious. PP and AP
3. I’ve never seen a unicorn talk or a hippogriff sing. clauses
5. Maurice saw the bus and that his son got on it. NP and clause
6. Lucy was grumpy and in a funk. AP and PP
Some of these violate parallelism by coordinating dissimiliar categories if they are
semantically similar (grumpy and in a funk are AP and PP respectively, but PP here
describes a state). Some students may nd the ones that coordinate dissimilar
categories to be unacceptable. Deletion may be involved so that there actually is
coordination of like categories, but not all of the phrase is spoken; for example,
8.8 Conjunction and Subordination
We’ve seen that coordination involves linking constituents in various ways. Subordination, on the
other hand, involves embedding one constituent in another.
Here, the clause he loves it is subordinate and introduced by because, a member of a large set of sub-
ordinating conjunctions (also called subordinating prepositions), words that introduce subordinate
clauses. Others in this class include although, even though, since, while, when, before, and after.
Make up a pair of clauses. First, coordinate them with one of the coordinating conjunctions (for,
and, nor, but, or, yet, so). Then try to use the same clauses, but this time subordinate one of the
clauses to the other using a subordinating conjunction. How does subordination affect the meaning
of the sentence?
Example
Answers will vary.