V. Culture Frameworks
A. Remember that your own culture functions as a reference point, and the frameworks are
just the beginning, the tip of the iceberg.
B. Frameworks are sophisticated stereotypes.
C. Hall’s High and Low Context
1. High Context (HC): Much of the communication is conveyed by the context. (Japan,
China, many other Asian, Latin American, African cultures). Social ties are long-
standing and close, communication tends to be implicit and indirect.
2. Low Context (LC): Most of the communication is carried in words. (U.S., Canada, other
Anglo cultures, Germany, Scandinavian cultures). Social ties are of shorter duration,
communication is explicit.
3. (See Figures 3.3, 3.4)
cultures tend to be polychronic, with several activities going on at once.
1. Classification system for cultures based on five universal problems:
a. What relationship should people have to nature? That is, how should they
think about their activities with regard to nature?
b. What sorts of relationships should exist among individuals?
c. What are the preferred forms or modes of human activity?
d. What is the best way to think about time?
e. What is the basic nature of humans?
(See Table 3.2)
5. Builds on Hall’s work.
Hofstede’s Six Dimensions
1. Unlike Hall and Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck, Hofstede’s framework is empirical.
1. Individualism–Collectivism
a. Measures the degree people of the culture are integrated into groups.
b. Individualist cultures include U.S., Canada, U.K., the Netherlands, Australia,
New Zealand.
c. Collectivist cultures include China, Japan, West and East Africa, Ecuador,
Guatemala, Indonesia.