Unlock document.
This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
36
4 Conclusion
In this chapter, we focused on a different type of trade than in previous chapters. Here,
we looked at the intermediate products used in production— not trade in final goods and
services. The Ricardian and Heckscher‒Ohlin models do not apply to intermediate
production goods and services. Instead, we had to focus on how production occurs
internationally, and this involves the issue of offshoring with some production processes
moved overseas. Offshoring implies that a final good may cross borders several times
The data in the 1980s were consistent with our predictions of an increase in the relative
demand for nonproduction or high-skilled workers, which was due to both the increase in
37
the use of high-skill base technology as well as offshoring.
The inconsistency in our model’s predictions in the 1990s, we argued, was due to job
polarization. Job polarization resulted in an increase in the relative wage, but a decrease
in the relative employment of nonproduction workers. It has also resulted in a decrease in
mid-level wage labor and an increase in the growth of high- and low-end wage labor. To
This chapter also provided visibility with real-world examples of how offshoring is
actually occurring in today’s global communities. India was used as an example of a
country that has implemented fiber-optic cables, with a sophisticated Internet and
Encourage your students to think about how all of this applies to them. What type of jobs
are they preparing for, and do their decisions match with what they have learned in this
chapter? How can they expect to thrive in a global economy given the lessons learned in
38
this chapter? What special skills, creative energies, and interests do they have that cannot
be replaced easily?
TEACHING TIPS
Tip 1: Pros and Cons of Offshoring
Offshoring is a hotly debated topic in the world today. As discussed in the Comments
portion of this Instructor’s Resource Manual, most of your students probably know
someone who has been affected by offshoring. Before teaching this chapter, ask them to
discuss their own opinions of offshoring. Then after completing the chapter, have a
second class discussion, asking students to weigh the costs of offshoring against its
benefits, as detailed in Chapter 7.
Tip 2: Relative Demand for Skilled Labor
Students often have trouble understanding how the relative demand for skilled labor can
Tip 3: Data Analysis and Recent Trends in Service Trade
The growth in services trade discussed in this chapter has helped make professional
39
services a major component of U.S. GDP. In 2007, the professional services industry
accounted for 17 percent of GDP, and employment in this industry at 25 million has
Tip 4: Outsourcing and Globalization
After completing this chapter, have your students listen to the interview “Outsourcing
and Globalization” as a homework assignment
Overview and Summary of the Interview:
This interview covers many of the topics in this chapter and reviews all of the trade
models discussed so far in this course. And then spends the latter half of the interview
40
discussing the topic of “The Future of Offshoring and You”.
This interview begins by talking about trade and the differences in the various models of
trade. The economist’s use of the standard tool kit of trade models and how they are
In the latter half of the interview the discussion moves to how globalization and trade
differs in the 21st century and how innovation is changing the landscape of trade. It
revolves around the types of innovations that occurred in the 20th century characterized
by the forklift and the types of innovation that is occurring in the 21st century
41
Human Capital must become specialized and flexible with new and uncommon skills in
order to retain job security. Those with a new kind of creative ability that might be
characterized with human understanding, wisdom, knowledge, creativity and experience
could be much more important in the new century. Those with limited skills that compete
with computers and whose jobs are characterized by mundane tasks that are easily
IN-CLASS PROBLEMS
1. What are the main differences between the offshoring phenomena in manufacturing
versus services?
Answer: Manufacturing involves low-skilled intensive labor, such as the assembly of
42
2. In a graph similar to Figure 7-12, illustrate the no-trade equilibrium, A*, for the
Foreign firm.
a. Supposing Foreign engages in international trade, add the world-relative price of
components to your graph. Indicate the Foreign firm’s resource allocation and production
of the final goods when it faces the new price line.
Answer: See the following figure, where the new equilibrium is B* and C*.
43
b. Illustrate the gains or losses faced by the firm relative to the initial offshoring
equilibrium, assuming a fall in the price of components.
Answer: See the following figure, where the new equilibrium is B*
′
and C*
′
.
3. Reproduce part (a) of Problem 2. Then illustrate the gains or losses faced by the firm
44
relative to the initial offshoring equilibrium, assuming a fall in the price of R&D.
Answer: See the following figure, where the new equilibrium is B*
′
and C*
′
.
4. Use the simplified offshoring model with two activities and the information below to
answer the following questions:
Two countries: Techland and Prodland
Two activities: Assembly, which is low-skilled labor-intensive, and product
development, which is high-skilled labor-intensive
Final good: JPod
Prodland: WPL = 1,000, WPS = 5,000
Techland: WTL = 30,000, WTS = 90,000
The costs of capital and trade are uniform across production activities.
45
a. Which country has the higher relative wage of low-skilled labor?
Answer: The relative wage for low-skilled workers is WPL/WPS = 1,000/5,000 = 1/5
b. Suppose the two countries engage in trade. Which activity will Techland
outsource? Explain.
Answer: With a higher relative wage for low-skilled labor, Techland will
c. Draw relative labor supply and demand diagrams for Prodland and Techland on
separate graphs.
Answer: See the figures below.
d. Suppose the cost of capital in Prodland decreases. What do you expect will happen to
46
the relative wage in each country?
Answer: When the cost of capital declines in Prodland, it becomes more profitable
for Techland to outsource additional assembly activities abroad. The activity that remains
5. In 2005, there were 127 legislations proposed by 40 states to restrict offshoring. The
following table defining the proposed legislations derives from the National Foundation
for American Policy.
Proposed Legislation
Definition
SCB: State Contract Ban
Prohibit work on state contracts to be
performed overseas or by individuals not
authorized to work in the United States.
47
CCR: Call Center Restrictions
Require operators to identify their location in
some manner.
HDR: Health Care and/or Data
Transfer Restrictions
Ban or require an “opt-in” for data to be
processed outside of the United States.
TAR: Trade Agreement
Restriction
Require that state not be a party to international
trade agreements on procurement.
ISP: In-State Preference
Stipulate in-state preference for state contracts.
SAR: Development Assistance
Restrict development assistance for outsourcing
9DN: 90-Day Notice
Require 90-day notice for transferring 25% of
workforce.
LSW: Location of State Work
Mandate report on location of state work.
NO: Notification of Outsourcing
Mandate notification to worker of outsourcing.
OCF: Outsourcing
Require outsourcing compensation fund for
Given the list of proposed legislation by states below, identify the potential winners and
losers of the offshoring restrictions:
State
Proposed Legislation
State
Proposed Legislation
Alabama
HDR
Arizona
SCB, CCR
California
CCR, ISP
Colorado
SSB, HDR
Connecticut
SCB, CCR, HDR, HDR,
DAR, ISP, 9DN
Florida
CCR, HDR, LSW
Georgia
CCR
Hawaii
SCB, ISP, DAR
Idaho
SCB
Illinois
HDR, CCR
Indiana
SCB
Iowa
SCB, CCR
Kansas
CCR
Maine
SCB
Maryland
SCB, TAR
Massachusetts
SCB
Michigan
ISP
Minnesota
SCB, HDR, CCR
Mississippi
SCB, CCR
Missouri
SCB, CCR, ISP
Montana
SCB
Nebraska
SCB, HDR, ISP
Nevada
HDR
New Hampshire
SCB, DAR, ISP
New Jersey
SCB, CCR
New Mexico
HDR
New York
SCB, DAR, NO
North Carolina
NO
North
Dakota
SCB, ISP
Ohio
SCB, OCF
Oklahoma
SCB
Oregon
SCB, CCR, TAR
Pennsylvania
SCB
Rhode Island
SCB
South
ISP
Texas
SCB, HDR
Data from: National Foundation for American Policy, 2006.
6. What impacts will the offshoring restrictions in Problem 5 have on industry
competitiveness in the proposed states?
Answer: The competitiveness of the industry facing the offshoring restrictions in the
7. Referring to Problem 5, would the proposed legislation be as restrictive if the services
were outsourced to another state (domestic offshoring) rather than across international
borders (foreign offshoring)? Comment on the welfare of the states involved.
Answer: Offshoring to another state is likely to elicit a significantly less-restrictive
50
8. How does trade today differ from that in the past?
Answer: There is more trade today than in the past. In addition, between 1925 and
1950, two categories—(1) foods, feeds, and beverages and (2) industrial supplies and
