consumption of the Y good in order to increase total satisfaction. Equilibrium will move from E1
to E2, and the consumer will be on a higher indifference curve and will have increased the
relative consumption of good X. Only if good X is a sufficiently “inferior” good will the relative
increase in the quantity of X consumed not occur.
2. Consider an indifference curve diagram such as Figure 3 in the text. A shift in the
income distribution toward consumers with a relatively stronger preference for good Y than in
the original distribution (the distribution with the solid lines) will make each curve “flatter” and
3. In Figure 8 in the text, consider the lower intersection point (not labeled) of isoquant Q0
with budget line B1. At that point, MPPL/MPPK is less than w/r because the isoquant is flatter
than the isocost line. This indicates that MPPL/w < MPPK/r, or that, at the margin, the output
4. No, it cannot be unambiguously determined. With capital on the vertical axis and labor
on the horizontal axis, the new flatter isocost line will have a vertical-axis intercept lower than
5. With labor on the horizontal axis and capital on the vertical axis, the original isocost line
has a vertical-axis intercept of 300 hours of capital usage and a horizontal-axis intercept of 3,000
6. The PPF would exhibit constant opportunity costs. Suppose that the employment of all
of the economy’s capital and labor in the X industry (an endpoint of the Edgeworth box
diagonal) yields 100 units of X output (and 0 units of Y output). Alternatively, suppose that
employment of all capital and labor in the Y industry yields 200 units of Y output (and 0 units of