International Cash Management ❖ 25
© 2021 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.
d. Your required rate of return should represent the return that you require to invest in the project.
Thus, the first step is to determine what rate you would earn if you could invest the funds in a
dollar-denominated risk-free asset over the same time period. Then, you need to add a risk
premium on to the risk-free rate. The premium should reflect the extra return you would need to
pursue this project. You have some idea of the risk that is involved in the project based on the
degree of uncertainty surrounding the demand for your service and the exchange rate.
Chapter 15
You have an opportunity to purchase a private competitor called Fernand in Mexico. You will use only
your funds if you decide to purchase the company.
a. When you attempt to determine the value of this company, how will you derive your required rate
of return? Specifically, should you use the U.S. or Mexico risk-free rate as a base when deriving
your required rate of return? Why?
b. Another Mexican firm called Vascon also considers the purchase of this firm. Explain why
Vascon’s required rate of return may be higher than your required rate of return? Is there any
reason why Vascon’s required rate of return may be lower than your required rate of return?
c. Assume that you and Vascon have the same expectations regarding the Mexican cash flows that
will be generated by Fernand. Fernand’s owner is willing to sell the company for 2 million
Mexican pesos. You and Vascon use a similar process to determine the feasibility of acquiring a
target. You both compare the present value of the target’s cash flows to the purchase price of the
target. Based on your analysis, Fernand would generate a positive net present value for your
firm. Based on Vascon’s analysis, Fernand would generate a negative net present value for
Vascon. How could you determine that the acquisition of Fernand is feasible, while Vascon
determines that the acquisition of Fernand is not feasible?
d. Repeat Question c, except reverse the assumptions. Based on your analysis, Fernand would
generate a negative net present value for your firm. Based on Vascon’s analysis, Fernand would
generate a positive net present value for Vascon. How could you determine that the acquisition of
Fernand is not feasible, while Vascon determines that the acquisition of Fernand is feasible?
ANSWER:
a. You should use a U.S. risk-free rate as a based since you are using U.S. funds to make the
investment.
b. Vascon should use the Mexican risk-free rate as a base since it would use Mexican pesos to make
the investment. Its required rate of return may be higher because the risk-free rate in Mexico is