208
meaning in the U.S. balance-of-payments accounts. In this chapter and subsequent chapters,
though, we sometimes call the “financial” account the “capital/financial” account in recognition
of the fact that economists and other analysts still regularly refer to such flows as “capital” flows.
C. As we note in footnote 1 on page 450, the IMF and the U.S. Department of Commerce
have changed the presentation format of financial account transactions in the BOP accounts. The
new format records increases in U.S. financial assets held abroad with a plus sign (formerly a
minus sign), as well as increases in foreign assets held in the United States with a plus sign
(previously also the case). We have maintained the debit (minus sign)/credit (plus sign) format
in this chapter because we think it is more useful for discussing payments outward and payments
inward for a country.
D. The new IMF/Department of Commerce recording format has also eliminated the
distinction, in the BOP accounting framework, between short-term and long-term financial
flows. The new format does distinguish, however, between “direct investment” and “portfolio
F. In the balance-of-payments sample transactions, transaction 7 was included in order to
bring Category III into the examples. You may want to indicate that this type of transaction is
unlikely to occur very often in a world of basically floating exchange rates, but that it can be
common in a regime of fixed rates.
V. Answers to End-of-Chapter Questions and Problems
1. The initiating entries would be as follows (not enough information is generally given to
ascertain the accompanying offsetting debit or credit entry):
wheat shipment – credit entry in category I under “exports of goods”; the accompanying
debit entry would be in category I under “unilateral transfers made (secondary
income paid)”