176
CHAPTER 16
POLITICAL ECONOMY AND U.S. TRADE POLICY
Learning Objectives:
Examine several basic concepts of the political economy of economic policy.
Summarize critical developments in the history of U.S. trade policy and multilateral trade
negotiations.
Identify the broad bases for the conduct of trade policy.
I. Outline
Introduction
– Contrasting Vignettes on Trade Policy
The Political Economy of Trade Policy
– The Self-Interest Approach to Trade Policy
– The Social Objectives Approach
A Review of U.S. Trade Policy and Multilateral Negotiations
– Reciprocal Trade Agreements and Early GATT Rounds
Summary
II. Special Chapter Features
In the Real World: World Attitudes toward Foreign Trade
In the Real World: U.S. Attitudes toward International Trade
III. Purpose of Chapter
The purpose of this chapter is two-fold. The first purpose is to introduce students to the
political economy of trade policy, and the second is to provide an overview of contemporary
U.S. trade policy, focusing on recent developments.
177
IV. Teaching Tips
A. We have found that students are very interested in the current politics of trade policy and
in identifying which groups are currently actively lobbying for changes in trade policy.
B. It is worthwhile to spend some time brainstorming with the class on possible reasons why
U.S. citizens’ support of international trade is relatively low compared to other countries (as
reflected in Table 1 on page 362). However, the Gallup poll results on page 364 suggest that,
C. Since much of this chapter is primarily descriptive/historical in nature, it can be assigned
to provide some institutional background to the course and can be left primarily for the students
to read on their own.
D. If you have a particular interest in this topic area and wish to devote class time to it, a
more thorough and rigorous focus on one or two current trade policy issues will help the material
E. Supplementing the material in the chapter with current material from sources such as The
Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and The Economist is also a
good way to emphasize the relevance of the policy issues discussed in earlier chapters as they
relate to the evolution of U.S. trade policy in recent years.
V. Answers to End-of-Chapter Questions and Problems
1. Legislation favored by a minority may in fact be enacted if the majority simply does not
actively participate in the voting process. This may occur because the costs of acquiring
information and voting are sufficiently great so that a large group of voters simply chooses not to
178
2. Bilateral trade negotiations are superior in that there is greater likelihood of two countries
reaching an agreement on reducing trade restrictions than for many countries reaching such an
agreement. It is also easier to target certain commodities or policy objectives and/or tailor the
3. The presence of protection on consumer goods such as textiles and clothing has
continued over the years even though it has been extremely costly to the consumer. This has
occurred for several reasons. First, the impact of protection on consumer prices is not
transparent, i.e., not clearly apparent to the consumer. The average consumer has little idea of
4. Concern by the government for the relative income position of a particular group or
segment of the economy can foster protection in several ways. First, the government may be less
willing to reduce protection on the products that are central to the income of these groups. This
is particularly true if there is little support for adopting a direct form of income transfers to these
groups if increased trade and the resulting structural change threaten their relative economic
well-being. Further, once it is observed that the government will step in with trade restrictions,
5. (a) From an economic perspective, TAA should facilitate the movement of resources
away from comparative disadvantage industries and towards comparative advantage industries.
Since this would make factors less “specific” in nature, it should enhance the short/medium-term
6. From a policy perspective, the impact of taxes such as tariffs is relatively well-known and
quite easily understood. There tends to be more general support for policy changes that clearly
7. (a) The case for nonreciprocity for the developing countries would logically be built
along the lines of an infant industry argument for protection. Until the industries gain experience
and sufficient scale economies, they should receive preferential treatment by the developed
8. If all intervention in agriculture were dropped, then trade and production would reflect
comparative advantage. Food prices would decline in those countries that previously had
protection and rise in free-trade countries. Agricultural income would decline in the protected
VI. Sample Exam Questions
A.
E
Es
ss
sa
ay
y
Q
Qu
ue
es
st
ti
io
on
ns
s
1. Briefly describe the evolution of U.S. trade policy since the imposition of the famous
Smoot-Hawley tariff. What has happened to the level of tariffs over the period? To the level of
protection in general?
2. Compare and contrast “rulesbased” trade policy with “resultsbased” trade policy. On
which type is the GATT based? Which type is consistent with the “new reciprocity” approach to
trade policy?
4. Since 1993, the U.S. and the European Union have had a number of disagreements over
5. Do you think that the developing countries should be given special, favorable treatment
in multilateral trade negotiations? Why or why not? Has such treatment been given to
developing countries in the past? Explain.