Chapter 11: International Debt Financing
PROBLEMS
1. In 1985, R.J. Reynolds (RJR for short) acquired Nabisco Brands and financed the
deal with a variety of financial instruments, including three dual-currency
Eurobonds. The first dual-currency bond, lead-managed by Nikko, raised JPY25
billion (which was equivalent to USD105.5 million at the time of issue). Coupons
were paid in yen, but the required final principal payment was not JPY25 billion
but USD115.956 million. The coupon was 7.75%, even though a comparable fixed–
rate Euroyen bond at that time carried only a 6.375% coupon. The actual 5-year
forward rate at the time was around JPY200/USD.
a. Given the “fat” coupon, is this bond necessarily a great deal for the investors?
Answer: No, it isn’t a particularly great deal for the investor because the payment at the
end is worth substantially less than the face amount of the bond. To see this, note that the
yen value of final payment can be found by multiplying the USD115.956 million by the
forward rate: USD115.956 million
JPY200/USD = JPY23.191 billion
which is less than JPY25 billion, the original principal.
Of course, the coupon is higher than the coupon on a straight Euroyen bond, so we
shouldn’t expect the final principal payment to be JPY25 billion otherwise the rate of
return on the bond would be 7.75%. If we hedge the dual currency bond and find the
internal rate of return on the yen cash flows, we find the value, y, which sets the
discounted yen payoffs equal to the cost of the bonds:
( ) ( )
5
i5
i=1
0.0775 × ¥25billion (¥200/$) × $0.115956 billion
¥25 billion = +
1 + y 1 + y
Using Excel’s IRR command, we find that the internal rate of return on the bond is
6.48%, which is greater than the rate of return offered by the straight Euroyen bond.
Thus, the bond is a good deal for investors if they can hedge at the forward rate of
¥200/$.
b. At maturity, in August 1990, the exchange rate was actually JPY144/USD. Was
the bond a good deal for investors?
Answer: We need to calculate the return to investors if the investors were unhedged.