10-11
2. Why did the Federal Reserve receive so much criticism for its policy of quantitative easing?
Do you agree with the critics? Was the policy simply mercantilism in disguise?
Critics claim that the decision by the Federal Reserve to increase the money supply via
quantitative easing was actually a form of protectionism, and in particular, simply a mercantilist
policy. According to critics, the Federal Reserve’s policy would prompt a decline in the value of
the U.S. dollar, making it easier for U.S. companies to export and harder for foreign companies
to export their products to the United States. Most students will probably agree that the fears of
the critics proved to be unfounded as the value of the dollar against a basket of major currencies
remained virtually unchanged. Students will probably also note that the Federal Reserve stated
that it would continue with its policy at least through 2014, which would indicate that it was
satisfied with the results.
INTEREST RATES AND EXCHANGE RATES
H) Interest rates also affect exchange rates. The Fisher Effect says that a country’s nominal
interest rate (i) is the sum of the required real rate of interest (r) and the expected rate of inflation
over the period for which the funds are to be lent (I).
i = r + I
I) The International Fisher Effect states that for any two countries, the spot exchange rate
should change in an equal amount but in the opposite direction to the difference in nominal
interest rates between two countries. Stated more formally:
(S1 – S2) / S2 × 100 = i$ – i¥
where i$ and i¥ are the respective nominal interest rates in two countries (in this case the U.S.
and Japan), S1 is the spot exchange rate at the beginning of the period and S2 is the spot exchange
rate at the end of the period.
J) While interest rate differentials suggest future exchange rates, this appears to hold in the long
run but not necessarily in the short run.
Video Note: Will Falling Euro End Up Boosting Europe’s Economy? explores the relationship