sult in higher forces on the grains, as seen in
9.35 It is stated in Example 9.2 that the thrust force
in grinding is about 30% higher than the cut-
ting force. Why is it higher?
We note in Fig. 9.7 that abrasive grains typi-
cally have very high negative rake angles. Let’s
now compare the force differences in grinding
of the thrust force in grinding? Explain.
9.37 Why is the material removal rate in electrical-
discharge machining a function of the melting
point of the workpiece material? Explain.
sequently, the higher the melting point, the
higher the energy required.
9.38 Inspect Table 9.4 and, for each process, list and
describe the role of various mechanical, physi-
9.39 Which of the processes listed in Table 9.4 would
not be applicable to nonmetallic materials? Ex-
By the student. The following are generally
not applicable to nonmetallic materials: elec-
trochemical machining, electrochemical grind-
ing, EDM, and wire EDM.
9.40 Why does the machining cost increase rapidly
as surface finish requirements become finer?
(a) ceramics, (b) thermoplastics, and (c) ther-
mosets? Explain.
(b) thermoplastics: chemical machining, high-
energy-beam machining, water-jet and
9.42 Other than cost, is there a reason that a grind-
ing wheel intended for a hard workpiece cannot
be used for a softer workpiece? Explain.
By the student. Recall that a soft workpiece
© 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. All rights reserved.
This material is protected by Copyright and written permission should be obtained from the publisher prior to any prohibited
reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
likewise. For information regarding permission(s), write to:
Rights and Permissions Department, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458.