Reserve Supplemental Exercises Chapter 10 Problem 4
In a random sample of 200 Phoenix residents who drive a domestic car, 165 reported wearing
their seat belt regularly, and another sample of 250 Phoenix residents who drive a foreign car
revealed 198 who regularly wore their seat belt.
(a) Do you think there is a reason not to believe these data?
(b) Is it reasonable to use the hypothesis-testing results from the previous problem to draw an
inference about the difference in proportion of seat belt usage
(i) of the spouses of these drivers of domestic and foreign cars? Explain your answer.
(ii) of the children of these drivers of domestic and foreign cars? Explain your answer.
(iii) of all drivers of domestic and foreign cars? Explain your answer.
(iv) of all drivers of domestic and foreign trucks? Explain your answer.
SOLUTION
(a)
Reserve Supplemental Exercises Chapter 10 Problem 5
An article in Fire Technology investigated two different foam-expanding agents that can be used
in the nozzles of firefighting spray equipment. A random sample of five observations with an
aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) had a standard deviation of 0.6. A random sample of five
observations with alcohol-type concentrates (ATC) had a standard deviation 0.8. Suppose that if
agent 1 produces a mean expansion that differs from the mean expansion of agent 2 by 1.5, you
would like to reject the null hypothesis with probability at least 0.9.
What sample size is required?
SOLUTION
0.05, 1 0.90, 1.5, 5n
= = − = =