Chapter Nine: Managing Individual Stress
Chapter Synopsis
This chapter addresses the issue of employee stress by focusing on six topics:
The definition of stress
The general adaptation syndrome
Learning Objectives
After completing this chapter, students should be able to:
1. Summarize what is meant by “stress”
2. Describe the major components of the organizational stress model
3. Compare individual, group, and organizational work stressors
Key Terms
stressAn adaptive response, moderated by individual differences, that is a consequence
of any action, situation, or event and that places special demands on a person.
stressorAn external event or situation that is potentially harmful to a person.
role conflictArises when a person receives incompatible messages regarding
appropriate role behavior.
emotion-focused copingThe actions taken by a person to alleviate stressful emotions.
The actions center on avoidance or escape from a person, problem, or event.
burnoutA psychological process brought about by unrelieved work stress, resulting in
emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and feelings of decreased accomplishment.
Type A behavior patternAssociated with research conducted on coronary heart
disease. The Type A person is an aggressive driver who is ambitious, competitive, task
oriented, and always on the move.
Lecture Outline
The Chapter outline is organized to correspond with the PowerPoint slides.
The chapter title slide may be used as a background to introduce the class.
Learning objectives
Review the chapter learning objectives. These will be reviewed on the last slide of the pack.
What is Stress? (1 of 4)
Stress is seen partially as a response to some stimulus, called a stressor. A stressor is a
What is Stress? (2 of 4)
Stress can be triggered by a number of sources.
What is Stress? (3 of 4)
We think it is useful to view stress as the response of a person to certain stimulus conditions
(actions, situations, events) or stressors .This allows us to focus attention on aspects of the
organizational environment that are potential stress producers. Whether stress is actually felt or
What is Stress? (4 of 4)
For an action, situation, or event to result in stress, it must be perceived by the individual to be a
there is no potential for stress. Three key factors determine whether an experience is likely to
result in stress: importance, uncertainty, and duration.
These factors are further discussed in Exhibit 9.1 Three Factors That Make an Event Stressful.
Exhibit 9.1 Three Factors That Make an Event Stressful
Importance relates to how significant the event is to the individual. For example, suppose you
are facing a job layoff. The more significant that layoff is to you, the more likely you are to find
it stressful. If you expect the layoff to be followed by a period of prolonged unemployment, you
will probably view it as a more important event than if immediate reemployment is assured.
places more demands on people than does knowing, even if the known result is perceived as
negative. Finally, duration is a significant factor. Generally, the longer special demands are
placed on us, the more stressful they are. Being given a distasteful job assignment that lasts
only a day or two may be mildly upsetting, while the same assignment lasting for six months
EXHIBIT 9.2 A Model of Stressors, Stress and Outcomes
The model shown in Exhibit 9.2 is designed to help illustrate the link among organizational
stressors, stress, and outcomes. Recall from our earlier definition that stress is a response to an
action, situation, or event that places special demands on an individual. These occurrences are
Moderators
The model in Exhibit 9.2 suggests that the relationship between stress and outcomes (individual
and organizational) is not necessarily direct; similarly, neither is the relationship between the
Individual Stressors
An increasingly prevalent type of role conflict occurs when work and nonwork roles interfere
with one another. The most common nonwork roles involved in this form of conflict are those
of spouse and parent. Balancing the demands of work and family roles is a significant daily task
Work Overload
Virtually everyone has experienced work overload, another common individual stressor, and the
incidence rate is increasing. Overload may be of two types: qualitative or quantitative.
EXHIBIT 9.3 The Underload-Overload Continuum
From a health standpoint, numerous studies have established that quantitative overload can
cause biochemical changes, specifically, elevations in blood cholesterol levels. One study
examined the relationship of overload, underload, and stress among 1,540 executives. Those
The Hardiness Factor
Many people who experience a great deal of change at work or in life show absolutely no
negative effects or health problems. For some reason, these people can withstand the negative
consequences of large doses of change that others cannot. Why this is so is an intriguing
question. One organizational researcher, Suzanne Kobasa, has proposed that individuals who
experience high rates of change without consequently suffering health problems might differ in
terms of personality from those who are negatively affected. She refers to the personality
characteristic in question as hardiness. People with the hardiness personality trait seem to
Recognizing Stress in Employees
How can we tell if our employees are stressed? Some indicators include:
New pattern of tardiness or absences
Gregarious employee becomes withdrawn
Significant Stressors
The list of potential group and organizational stressors is a long one. In the next chapter, a
number of group characteristics are discussed, including group norms, leadership, and the status
Nonwork Stressors
Stress is also caused by factors outside the organization. Although the emphasis in this chapter
is on work, nonwork stressors should not be ignored because they affect work. Raising children,
Chapter 09 – Managing Individual Stress
caring for elders, volunteering in the community, taking college courses, and balancing family
and work life are stressful for numerous people. The stress produced outside work is likely to
impact a person’s work behavior and performance. The distinction between work and nonwork
is blurred, and overlapping stressors are significant in any discussion or analysis of stress.
Cognitive Appraisal
As presented earlier in the model of stress in Exhibit 9.2, individuals using their own view of
Coping With Stress
Through the primary and secondary appraisal, a coping approach is decided upon and applied.
The two types of coping are: problem-focused and emotion-focused. Problem-focused coping is
the actions taken to deal directly with the source of the stress. For example, workers facing a
disrespectful manager may deal with his harassing style by being absent from work. This
absenteeism enables the workers to be removed, some of the time, from the disrespectful
manager. Emotion-focused coping is the steps a person takes to address or alleviate stressful
Stress Outcomes
In one study, conducted at the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan, a
sample of 2,010 employees was chosen from 23 occupations to examine the relationship
between stress and stress consequences. The occupations were combined into four specific
groupsblue-collar workers (skilled and unskilled) and white-collar workers (professional and
nonprofessional). Blue-collar workers reported the highest subjective effects, including job
dissatisfaction; white-collar workers, the lowest. The unskilled workers reported the most
boredom and apathy with their job conditions. They specifically identified a number of major
stress is clearly an individual outcome; it is the individual’s performance that is being affected.
Just as clearly, however, the organization experiences important consequences from stress
related performance decrements.
Individual Outcomes of Stress
Depression: Key Facts
With respect to depression, a comprehensive survey of American workers concluded that a third
of them experienced job stressrelated depression.
There is a stigma associated with depression. Part of the stigma comes because most people
lack an understanding of depression and its frequency. Unfortunately, most managers are not
aware of these facts:
•According to Mental Health America, the cost of depression is $51 billion a year in medical
bills, lost productivity, and absenteeism.
Stress Outcomes
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) is the diagnostic tool
used to detect depression. The DSM-IV indicates that the diagnosis of depression requires the
presence of either a depressed mood or diminished interest in all or most activities, marked
psychomotor retardation, significant appetite or weight change, changes in sleep, fatigue or loss
of energy, problems thinking or concentrating, feelings of worthlessness, excessive feelings of
guilt, or thoughts of suicide or death. These signs must be persistent over the course of two
weeks. Managerial understanding of these symptoms can help the organization, especially when
the manager asks professional counselors to intervene. It would be unwise for managers to
Burnout (1 of 3)
Burnout is a psychological process, brought about by unrelieved work stress, that results in
emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and feelings of decreased accomplishment. Exhibit 9.4
displays some indicators of these three burnout outcomes. A recent research study found that
burnout is linked to several aspects of ill health, including sleep disturbances, systematic
inflammation, impaired immunity functions, and blood coagulation. Burnout tends to be a
particular problem among people whose jobs require extensive contact with and/or
responsibility for other people. Indeed, much of the research that has been conducted on
Burnout (2 of 3)
Exhibit 9.3 shares some of the indicators that someone is suffering from burnout.
Burnout (3 of 3)
A very important idea implicit in this conceptualization of burnout relates to job involvement. A
high degree of involvement in, identification with, or commitment to one’s job or profession is
a necessary prerequisite for burnout. It is unlikely that one would be-come exhausted without
Factors that Contribute to Burnout
Organizations contribute to employee job burnout in a variety of ways. Research identifies four
Myths About Burnout
This slide highlights the OB matters block.
Organizational Consequences of Stress
Although precise figures are lacking, based on a variety of estimates and projections from
government, industry, and health groups, we place the costs of stress at about $300 billion
annually in the United States. This estimate considers the reductions in operating effectiveness
resulting from stress. The effects include poorer decision making and decreases in creativity.
Stress Moderators
Stressors evoke different responses from different people. Some people are better able to cope
with a stressor than others. They can adapt their behavior in such a way as to meet the stressor
head-on. On the other hand, some people are predisposed to stress; that is, they are not able to
adapt to the stressor. The model presented in Exhibit 9.2 suggests that various factors can
Chapter 09 – Managing Individual Stress
moderate the relationships among stressor, stress, and consequences. A moderator is a
condition, behavior, or characteristic that qualifies the relationship between two variables. The
effect may be to intensify or weaken the relationship. The relationship between the number of
gallons of gasoline used and total miles driven, for example, is moderated by driving speed. At
Big 5 Model of Personality
As discussed in Chapter 3, the term personality refers to a relatively stable set of characteristics,
temperaments, and tendencies that shape the similarities and differences in people’s behavior.
The number of aspects of personality that could serve as stress moderators is quite large. We
will confine our attention to those aspects of personality previously identified in Chapter 3: the
Big Five model, locus of control, and self-efficacy. As you may recall from Chapter 3, the Big
Five model of personality is made up of five dimensions: extroversion, emotional stability,
it. To a somewhat lesser degree, those high on extroversion are also more predisposed to
experience positive emotional states. Because they are sociable and friendly, they are more
likely to have a wider network of friends than their introverted counterparts; consequently, they
have more resources to draw upon in times of distress. If you are low on agreeableness you tend
to be antagonistic, unsympathetic, and even rude, toward others. You are also probably
somewhat mistrusting of others. These attributes increase the likelihood you will find other
people to be a source of stress, and since others are more likely to find interacting with you
stressful as well, an interpersonal relationship environment full of stressful situations is created.
Conscientiousness is the Big Five dimension most consistently related to job performance and
success. To the extent that good performance leads to satisfaction and other rewards, those high
Type A Behavior Pattern
In the 1950s, two medical cardiologists and researchers, Meyer Friedman and Ray Rosenman,
discovered what they called the Type A behavior pattern. They searched the medical literature
and found that traditional coronary risk factors such as dietary cholesterol, blood pressure, and
pattern of behavior or traits. They eventually called this the Type A behavior pattern (TABP).
Type B Behavior Pattern
In contrast, the Type B behavior pattern individual mainly is free of the TABP characteristics
and generally feels no pressing conflict with either time or persons. The Type B may have
Social Support
Both the quantity and quality of the social relationships individuals have with others appear to
Social Support
Social support may take the form of emotional support (expressing concern, indicating trust,
boosting esteem, listening); appraisal support (providing feedback and affirmation); or
informational support (giving advice, making suggestions, providing direction). People who can
Stress Prevention and Management (1 of 4)
An astute manager never ignores a turnover or absenteeism problem, workplace drug abuse, a
decline in performance, hostile and belligerent employees, reduced quality of production, or any
other sign that the organization’s performance goals are not being met. The effective manager,
organizational stress are available
Stress Prevention and Management (2 of 4)
Exhibit 9.5 presents how organizational stress management programs can be targeted. Programs
are targeted to (1) identify and modify work stressors, (2) educate employees in modifying and
understanding stress and its impact, and (3) provide employees support to cope with the
negative impact of stress.
In a rapidly changing work environment, this type of targeting is difficult to accomplish.
However, a trained, educated, and knowledgeable workforce can make modifications with the
help of management in how work is performed.
Stress Prevention and Management (3 of 4)
Some of the targeted, corrective programs include:
•Training programs for managing and coping with stress.
•Redesigning work to minimize stressors.
•Changes in management style to one of more support and coaching to help workers achieve
Stress Prevention and Management (4 of 4)
The potential for success of any prevention or management-of-stress program is good if there is
a true commitment to understanding how stressors, stress, and outcomes are linked. There is a
very important distinction between preventing stress and managing it. Stress prevention focuses
Stress Management Program Targets
These and other efforts are targeted to prevent and/or manage stress. First, however, we will
look at a way of thinking about organizational stress prevention.
Maximizing Person-Environment (P-E) Fit (1 of 2)
In defining stress earlier in the chapter, we emphasized that stress is the consequence of the
interaction between an environmental stimulus (a stressor) and the individual’s response. From
this perspective, stress may be viewed as a consequence of the relationship between the
individual and the work environment. While there are many ways of thinking about individual
organizational relationships and stress, the concept of personenvironment fit is the most
widely used. Personenvironment fit occurs when there is compatibility between individuals
and their work environments. When an employee perceives that he or she fits well with the
organization, the employee is more likely to have higher levels of organizational commitment,
job satisfaction, and adjustment, while experiencing lower levels of stress. Although originally
thought of as a single dimension, researchers have identified several different types of PE fit,
including:
1. Personorganization fit: Degree to which employees/applicants and organizations are
compatible and meet each others’ needs. An employee who doesn’t fit with the
organizational culture will experience stress and may end up leaving the organization.