Case 4-2
Summary
Honeywell is a segmented company within the manufacturing industry, with different divisions each
possessing their own individual cultures. This caused Honeywell to implement a uniform culture across
all segments to retain their top-level managers and to create a sense of community through a “One
Honeywell” culture. While this approach was successful leading to increased investments in new products
and services and less top-level turnover, Honeywell was not immune from the economic recession of
2008.
Analysis
The Honeywell case is an excellent opportunity for instructors to discuss how the culture of a company
can change during a recession. Even in the case of a successful company, it is important for students to be
aware that economic factors, both internally and externally, can impact a human resources strategy.
In addition, instructors may wish to address alternatives for the approach that Honeywell pursued in terms
of their decision to furlough. Alternatives such as severance pay and termination were potential options;
however, Honeywell was strategic in their approach to prepare for postrecession conditions and
positioned themselves to recover quicker than their competitors.
Questions
1. How does the use of HR forecasting reflect Honeywell’s strategy and culture?
“HR forecasting identifies the estimated supply and demand for the different types of human resources in
the organization over some future period based on analysis of past and present demand.” Therefore,
2. Which quantitative or qualitative man power forecasting method do you believe Honeywell used to
decide to move forward with furloughs rather than layoffs? Explain.
Honeywell seemed to have used both qualitative and quantitative analysis. “We need to use both