14 – 29 Compensation – Thirteenth Edition Gerhart │Newman │Milkovich
Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill
Education.
However, there tends to be a gradual increase in the spread between executives’
compensation and the average salaries of their employees.
A second approach to understanding executive compensation focuses less on the
difference in wages between executive and other jobs and more on explaining the level of
executive wages. The premise in this economic approach is that the worth of CEOs, or
their subordinates, should correspond closely to some measure of company success, such
as profitability or sales. Numerous studies over the past 30 years have demonstrated that
executive pay bears some relationship to company success. A recent article analyzing the
results from over 100 executive pay studies found empirical evidence that firm size (sales
or number of employees) is by far the best predictor of CEO compensation. Size variables
are nine times better at explaining executive compensation than are performance measures.
Some evidence contradicts this, though. Research has shown that executive compensation
in some firms was highly related to company value, while at others there was no
relationship whatsoever. Worse yet, the present value of future compensation (mostly
stock options, which account for about 75% of executive pay packages) showed very little
sensitivity to company value.
A third view of CEO salaries, called agency theory, incorporates the political motivations
that are an inevitable part of the corporate world. This argument states that CEOs make
decisions that aren’t in the economic best interests of the firm and its shareholders. One
variant on this view suggests that the normal behavior of a CEO is self-protective—CEOs
will make decisions to solidify their positions and to maximize the rewards they personally
receive. It is possible to state that the CEO will increase their wages in all of the following
three situations:
• If truly underpaid
• If the CEO is not underpaid in a company that is performing well
• If the CEO is not underpaid bin a company that is performing poorly
Agency theory argues that executive compensation should be designed to ensure that
executives have the best interests of stockholders in mind when they make decisions.
4. Romance Novels, Inc, located in Cheektowaga, NY, has gradually increased the
number of contingent workers (full-time, temporary) from 10 percent of the
workforce to about 28 percent today. Why might they do this? Also, what equity
problems can arise from hiring contingent workers, especially when they work
alongside regular employees?
Hiring contingent workers has proven to be the major source of savings in the area of
employee benefits. Another reason why Romance Novels, Inc could have increased its
workforce mix of contingent workers to 28 percent is the added flexibility such