CASE 7: A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SNAFU
1. Several problems are evident in this case.
a. There is no evidence that the organization established objective job standards by which to
appraise employee performance. Absence objective and formalized performance criteria,
managers will likely apply their own subjective standards to evaluate the performance of
their subordinates.
b. Garth Fryer may have evaluated his employees as outstanding in order to eliminate having
c. Supervisors should never hold performance appraisal meetings with their employees until
all levels of management agree on the evaluation to be given. As this case illustrates,
d. Popelmill is at fault by not communicating to his managers his expectations for the
performance appraisal process. If he expected a distribution of employee performance in
each unit, subordinate managers need to know this when evaluating their employees.
2. Responses to Question 1 largely provide answers to this question. Knowing the objectives of
3. Peer appraisals have both strengths and weaknesses. On the positive side, peers, as
performance evaluators are in a good position to appraise the daily work performance of fellow
4. The attitude of Marcus Singh is new a serious issue for Garth Fryer. Fryer must assume
responsibility for some of the problems encountered. If Singh’s attitudinal and behavioral