c. Original Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3
Total assets $ 550,000 $800,000 $800,000 $1,300,000
EBIT $ 110,000 $160,000 $160,000 $ 260,000
d. Original Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3
Total liabilities $400,000 $150,000 $150,000 $ 650,000
TL/TA 73% 19% 19% 50%
e. Alternative 1 results in loss of control (to 49 percent) for the firm. Under it, he loses
his majority of shares outstanding. Indicated earnings per share increase, and the debt
ratio is reduced considerably (by 54 percentage points).
The differences between these two alternatives, which are illustrated in Parts c and
d, are that the increase in earnings per share is substantially greater under Alternative
3, but so is the debt ratio. With its low debt ratio (19 percent), the firm is in a good
position for future growth under Alternative 2. However, the 50 percent ratio under 3