Chapter 18: Bank Regulation ❖ 10
Interpret the following statements made by Wall Street analysts and portfolio managers.
a. “The FDIC recently subsidized a buyer for a failing bank, which had different effects on FDIC
costs than if the FDIC closed the bank.”
Closing a bank would have resulted in the liquidation of assets. In this case, the FDIC would use
the proceeds of liquidation to pay off depositors, and it would make up the difference. By
b. “Bank of America has pursued the acquisitions of many failed banks, because it sees potential
benefits from these deals.”
The FDIC would have to support the acquisition, so that a bank may be able to acquire the
c. “By allowing a failing bank time to resolve its financial problems, it imposes an additional tax on
taxpayers.”
Managing in Financial Markets
A bank has asked you to assess various strategies it is considering and explain how they could affect its
regulatory review. Regulatory reviews include an assessment of capital, asset quality, management,
earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to financial market conditions. Many types of strategies can result in
more favorable regulatory reviews based on some criteria, but less favorable regulatory reviews based on
other criteria. The bank is planning to issue more stock, retain more of its earnings, increase its holdings
of Treasury securities, and reduce its business loans. IT has historically been rated favorably by
regulators, but the bank believes that these strategies will result in an even more favorable regulatory
assessment.
a. Which regulatory criteria will be affected by the bank’s strategies? How?
The capital level will increase, asset quality will improve, and liquidity will improve. However,
b. Do you believe that the strategies planned by the bank will satisfy shareholders? Is it possible for
the bank to use strategies that would satisfy both regulators and shareholders? Explain.