The Legal Environment of Business: A Critical Thinking Approach
25–11
Case Summary—Safeco Insurance Co. v. Burr
This case determined that Safeco Insurance and GEICO General Insurance were not guilty
Suggested Answers to Critical Thinking about the Law Questions
1. The Court found that GEICO and Safeco would have recklessly been disregarding the law if
2. If GEICO or Safeco had charged their applicants a higher initial rate because of the credit
score, they would have violated a statute of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
Case Summary—Jerman v. Carlisle, NcNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, LPA
Carlisle filed a complaint in Ohio state court on behalf of a client, Countrywide Home
Loans, Inc. Carlisle sought foreclosure of a mortgage held by Countrywide in real property
owned by Karen Jerman. The complaint included a “Notice,” later served on Jerman, stating that
the mortgage debt would be assumed to be valid unless Jerman disputed it in writing. Jerman’s
Answers to Review Questions
25-1. In the creditor–debtor context garnishment refers to an order of the court granted to a
creditor to seize wages or bank accounts of a debtor. This can be either a postjudgment or