14-5
3. A person would be more willing to support the intellectual property rights of an individual if
they knew he or she had worked hard to create the idea or work. It would be difficult for
them to give rights to someone who just came up with an idea in a matter of moments.
Case Summary—Toys ‘R’ Us, Inc. v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc.
This case is a trademark infringement case. In this case, plaintiff Toys “R” Us, Inc., sold
children’s clothes in stores across the country from the beginning of 1960. The firm obtained a
Suggested Answers to Critical Thinking about the Law Questions
2. The reference of past cases is a crucial piece of information that is missing in this case. It is
because without these understanding the background of these cases it would be difficult to
Case Summary—Victor Moseley and Kathy Moseley et al., dba Victor’s Little Secret v. V
Secret Catalogue, Inc. et al.
This case is in the book to show analysis relevant in trademark dilution cases. In this case, a
novelty store, “Victor’s Little Secret” did not infringe upon the Victoria’s Secret trademark. The
Case Summary—Bilski v. Kappos
This case deals with patents. The petitioner had sent in an application to file a patent for
their invention. However, the application was rejected on the basis that it was an abstract idea
that had been expressed mathematically. Additionally, they stated that it did not pass the