plan is not a feasible financial plan. One point of this exercise is to show that the
methods work even when there is a large deficit in the funding (represented here by the
Revenue 12,500 16,000 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
-Non-Interest Expenses -125,000 -125,000 NI 0 -78,750 -76,300
EBIT -112,500 –109,000 +Dep 0 5,000 4,500
Total Flow -50,000 -109,450 2,395,500
Balance Sheets Startup Year 1 Year 2 NPV 1,283,263
Assets
Required Cash 0 3,000 3,000 Valuation (DDA) (Surplus Cash Situation Affects Terminal Flow)
Surplus Cash 0 -109,450 -213,950 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
Deferred Tax Asset 0 33,750 66,450 NI 0 -78,750 –76,300
Gross Fixed Assets 50,000 50,000 50,000
Accumulated Depreciation 0 -5,000 -9,500 +Dep 0 5,000 4,500
Net Fixed Assets 50,000 45,000 40,500 -dDTA 0 -33,750 -32,700
Total Assets 50,000 -27,700 -104,000 -Capex -50,000 0 0
Liabilities and Equity -dNWC 0 107,500 104,500
Accounts Payable 750 750 +Principal Proc. 0 0 0
Accrued Expenses 300 300 Equity VCF -50,000 0 0
Debt 0 0 0 Terminal Flow 2,286,050
Equity 50,000 -28,750 -105,050 Total Flow -50,000 0 2,286,050
Total L+E 50,000 -27,700 -104,000
NPV 1,302,692
Accounting Cash Flows Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Sum
NI 0 -78,750 –76,300 0
+Depr 0 5,000 4,500 Difference in EqCF 0 109,450 –109,450
-dDTA 0 –33,750 -32,700 NPV of Difference 19,429
-dAR 0 0 0 DDA Value Decline 19,429 (=1,302,692-1,283,263)