SOCCIO ARCHETYPES OF WISDOM
Consider opening the course with a general discussion of the
virtues of rational discourse. This is a good way to deal
directly with student skepticism and relativism. I have found
that a clear but light touch works best in the beginning. A
light touch early on minimizes the risk of insulting,
intimidating, or alienating students. It is important not to
come across as either namby-pamby (hyper-relativistic) or
doctrinaire (rigidly authoritarian).
A scan of the Overviews and Chapter 18: Philosophy as a
Way of Life provides a great opportunity for raising the
following questions:
What is rational discourse, and what are its virtues?
Does appearance differ from reality?
When is an explanation adequate?
Is truth (knowledge) relative?
Is truth a matter of consensus?
Is objectivity possible?
Are there any universal truths or moral values?
Can we judge the past with present standards?
Is everything a matter of perspective?
Is there (really) such a thing as wisdom?
Can the unenlightened recognize the enlightened?
Does philosophy have anything to offer in today s
sophisticated world of high technology and instant
information?