5.3 • Solutions 297
b. False. The matrix in Example 3 is diagonalizable, but it has only 2 distinct eigenvalues. (The
23. A is diagonalizable because you know that five linearly independent eigenvectors exist: three in the
24. No, by Theorem 7(b). Here is an explanation that does not appeal to Theorem 7: Let
1
v and
2
v be
25. Let
1
{}v be a basis for the one-dimensional eigenspace, let
2
v and
3
v form a basis for the two-
26. Yes, if the third eigenspace is only one-dimensional. In this case, the sum of the dimensions of the
27. If A is diagonalizable, then
1
APDP
−
=
for some invertible P and diagonal D. Since A is invertible, 0
is not an eigenvalue of A. So the diagonal entries in D (which are eigenvalues of A) are not zero, and
28. If A has n linearly independent eigenvectors, then by the Diagonalization Theorem,
1
APDP
−
=
for
some invertible P and diagonal D. Using properties of transposes,
A
29. The diagonal entries in
1
D are reversed from those in D. So interchange the (eigenvector) columns of
P to make them correspond properly to the eigenvalues in
1
.D In this case,